top of page

A Boundary Without Respect Isn't a Healthy Relationship



Plants have boundaries. I know that sounds like a strange way to begin a conversation about respect, but stay with me for a minute.


One of the reasons plants produce essential oils is that they can't exactly pick themselves up and leave when something in their environment isn't working for them. They're rooted. They have to exist where they are, so they have evolved extraordinarily sophisticated chemical systems that help them interact with the world around them. Depending on the plant and the compounds involved, those chemicals can deter herbivores, inhibit certain microorganisms, attract beneficial organisms, and help the plant respond to environmental stress.


The plant can't say, "This isn't a healthy environment for me. I'm leaving." Because the environment they are in is healthy. It's the things that they co-exist with that have the impact. If the environment were truly unhealthy, they wouldn't thrive. So it has ways of protecting itself within the environment it has.


Humans have something plants don't.


We can leave. We can change our environment. We can change the amount of access someone has to us. We can change the way we participate in a relationship. We can say no. We can decide that something is no longer acceptable to us.


We call those things boundaries. And I've been thinking about boundaries a lot lately, specifically with regards to how other people should be showing up in them.


And I think we've gotten one very important part of the conversation wrong.


Boundaries Aren't Just About the Person Setting Them


If you've spent any amount of time on social media in the last few years, you've probably heard some variation of this:


"Boundaries are about what you will do. They aren't about controlling the other person."


That's true.


But it has been repeated so many times, and with so little nuance, that we've somehow arrived at the idea that the other person has no responsibility whatsoever when a boundary is communicated.


That's not true.


A boundary may belong to the person setting it, but respect is a two-person activity.


If I tell someone, "I don't want to discuss this with you," they don't have to agree with my decision. They don't have to like it. They don't have to think my reasoning is good enough.


But if they respect me, they will respect the boundary. They might be disappointed. They might be confused. They might even think I'm making the wrong decision.


What they won't do is deliberately find a way around it.


And that distinction matters enormously.


Because there is a massive difference between someone not liking your boundary and someone refusing to respect it.


You Don't Have to Agree With a Boundary to Respect It


This is something we need to get much better at understanding. Respect does not require agreement. I can think your boundary is ridiculous and still respect it. I can think you're being overly cautious and still respect it. I can believe you are making a mistake and still respect your right to make that mistake.


I can even be hurt by your decision and still respect it.


That's what adults in healthy relationships do.


We don't get to override another person's autonomy simply because we believe our reasons for doing so are better.


Think about something as simple as a friend saying, "I'm not comfortable talking about my marriage right now."


You might desperately want to know what's happening. You might think talking would help them. You might even think they're making a terrible decision. But you don't get to corner them at another gathering, ask their spouse for information behind their back, have another friend report back to you, or start digging through private accounts because you didn't like the answer you were given.


You accept that they said no.


That's respect. And it isn't just about politeness.


It's about recognizing that another human being has the right to control access to their own life.


What Happens When Someone Doesn't Respect the Boundary?


This is where the conversation gets much more uncomfortable. Because when someone repeatedly ignores a boundary, the problem isn't necessarily that you haven't communicated it clearly enough. Sometimes the boundary was perfectly clear. They just don't respect it. And that tells you something.


A healthy relationship requires two people who are willing to recognize the other person's autonomy. There can be disagreements. There can be conflict. There can be hurt feelings. There can be misunderstandings. There can be mistakes. But there has to be a baseline understanding that the other person is still a separate human being whose choices matter. When that disappears, the relationship becomes something else.


"I want access to you, therefore I am entitled to access to you."


And that is not love. That is not concern. That is not family obligation. That is not friendship.


That is entitlement. Entitlement is not healthy.


When the Boundary Becomes "You No Longer Have Access to Me"


This is where I think the conversation around boundaries gets particularly distorted. We're very comfortable with boundaries that sound reasonable and pleasant.


"I need an hour to myself."


"I can't take that call right now."


"I don't discuss politics at dinner."


"I need you to speak to me respectfully."


Those are easy to understand. But what happens when the boundary is bigger? What happens when the boundary is:


You no longer have access to me.


That's a different conversation. And sometimes it is exactly the boundary that is necessary.


There are circumstances where continued contact is not healthy. There are relationships where every attempt at communication becomes another opportunity for manipulation, disrespect, control, or harm.

In those situations, "I need you to respect my boundaries" may eventually become "You no longer get access to me."


When that boundary is communicated, the other person doesn't have to agree with it. They don't have to understand it. They don't have to believe it is fair. They don't have to like it.


But they do have to respect it if they want to demonstrate that they have any respect for you.


No Contact Means No Contact


This is the part of this whole conversation I'm having to sit with very deeply right now because this blog is a deeply personal one. It is a lived reality that has me sick to my stomach.


There is a particular kind of violation that happens when you have made a very clear decision that you no longer want contact with someone, and they decide that your decision is simply an obstacle they need to work around.


They find another avenue.


They contact you through something unrelated to the relationship.


They show up in places they know you frequent.


They gather information about your life through other people.


They obtain photographs or personal information that you intentionally kept private.


They find ways to remain connected to your life even after you have explicitly said that you do not want them in it.


And I want to be very clear about something:


That is not a boundary problem. The boundary has been communicated.


The problem is respect.


There is a huge difference between someone accidentally crossing a boundary because they didn't understand it and someone repeatedly finding new ways around it after they know exactly where the boundary is.


The first can be a communication problem. The second is a relationship problem. And sometimes, it is much more serious than that.


The Part Nobody Talks About: The Feeling of Being Violated


When someone refuses to respect your decision to have no contact, the damage isn't limited to the individual interactions.


It changes how safe you feel in your own life. You start wondering who has access to your information.


Who has seen your pictures? Who is passing along information? Who knows where you are? Who is talking to them? What else do they know? Where else are they looking?


And suddenly ordinary things become things you have to think about.


A family photograph that was shared privately no longer feels like a harmless photograph. "Home" becomes something you think about differently. A business contact form that exists for completely legitimate purposes becomes another possible avenue for someone to circumvent a personal boundary.


And that can leave you feeling like you have to disappear in order to have peace.


That's the part that makes me angry.


Because I should not have to disappear to earn the right to live my life peacefully.


Neither should you.


Privacy is not secrecy. Wanting distance from someone is not cruelty. Not wanting a relationship with someone does not make you responsible for managing their feelings about that decision.


And choosing not to have contact does not create an obligation to make yourself smaller, harder to find, or less visible simply because someone else refuses to accept that they no longer have access to you.


I want to say this very loudly because I think it is really important for other people in situations like this to hear:


YOU ARE NOT THE PROBLEM.


Respect Is What Makes Boundaries Work


This is why I don't actually agree with the idea that boundaries are entirely about the person setting them.


The enforcement of a boundary is yours. The respect for that boundary is part of the relationship.


If I say, "I need space to think so we can come back to this when I'm less emotional," I am responsible for ending the conversation. I am also responsible for taking the needed space and then coming back to the conversation. But the person on the other side of me is responsible for deciding whether they are going to respect what I just said.


If they keep pushing, keep demanding, keep manipulating, keep contacting me through other people, keep showing up, or keep looking for ways around the boundary, I now have information I didn't have before. I know something about them. I know that my autonomy is not being respected.


And that matters.


Because relationships aren't built solely on affection.


They're built on trust. They're built on reciprocity. They're built on accountability. They're built on the ability to disagree without attempting to overpower the other person. They're built on respecting the other person's right to make decisions about their own life.


Without those things, affection isn't enough. History isn't enough. Being related isn't enough.


Love isn't enough.


Sometimes the Boundary Doesn't Change the Other Person. It Reveals Them.


This may be one of the most important things I've learned about boundaries. We often talk about boundaries as though their purpose is to change the dynamic. Sometimes they do. A healthy person may hear your boundary and adjust. They may say, "I didn't realize I was doing that." They may apologize, and with that apology comes different behavior in the future. They may not understand your boundary immediately, but they respect it while they work through their feelings about it.


That's what healthy relationships can look like.


But sometimes you set a boundary and discover that the other person has absolutely no intention of respecting it.


That's information.


The boundary didn't fail. The boundary did exactly what it was supposed to do.


It showed you what you needed to know. It showed you who could respect your autonomy and who couldn't. It showed you who valued having a relationship with you enough to change their behavior and who valued access to you more than they valued your wellbeing.


Those are not the same thing.


Once you know that, you get to make a different decision about the relationship.


We Don't Need to Become Hard to Protect Ourselves


There is another trap here that I don't want us to fall into. When someone violates our boundaries, it can be tempting to decide that the answer is to become completely inaccessible.


Don't trust anyone. Don't share anything. Don't let people in. Don't post pictures. Don't tell people where you are. Don't allow anyone close enough to hurt you.


And I understand why that impulse exists. When your privacy has been violated, control can feel like safety. I'm struggling with continuing to post on my socials for business while simultaneously trying to figure out how to yank everything on private accounts down.


But I don't want a world where the people who disrespect boundaries get to determine how freely the rest of us live. I don't want to become smaller because someone else refuses to behave appropriately.


I don't want to spend my life looking over my shoulder. And I don't want you to either.


There is a difference between taking reasonable steps to protect your privacy and restructuring your entire existence around another person's refusal to respect you. One is protection. The other is surrendering your freedom to their behavior.


I refuse to believe that the answer is for the person whose boundary was violated to disappear.


This Is What Plants Can Teach Us


Now back to the plants.


Essential oils are one example of a plant changing its chemistry in response to uninvited guests in its environment. They are rooted and grounded, and in this they have strength. They're one piece of a much larger biological system that allows it to interact with the world around it. Essential oils are a plant's boundaries in a very real sense.


Our boundaries are part of our own system of interacting with the world. They simply show up in the form of words and actions (although we very much do have chemical receptors to communicate, but that's a conversation for a different day). When someone respects those boundaries, relationships have room to be healthy. When someone doesn't, we have learned something important. Not necessarily that they're a terrible human being. Not necessarily that they agree with us. Not necessarily that they have to understand our reasoning. But we have learned that they are unwilling to respect a limit we have placed around our own life.


And that means we are allowed to enact our own essential oil system. We are allowed to protect ourselves. We are allowed to remove the people who are sharing information that we don't want shared. We are allowed to move and not set up a forwarding address. We are allowed to call the police if they are standing at the door and refuse to leave.


This isn't being dramatic. This is refusing to live in fear and taking a stand when other people are acting like fools. FAFO is real.


A healthy relationship doesn't require that two people agree on everything. It requires that both people understand that the other person is a person. A separate person. A person with autonomy. A person whose no means no. A person whose private life belongs to them. A person who gets to decide who has access to them.


That's not selfish.


That's not cruelty.


That's not "cutting people off because you can't handle accountability."


That's basic respect.


And if someone repeatedly demonstrates that they will not give you that basic respect, the answer isn't always to find a better way to explain your boundary.


Sometimes you've explained it enough. Sometimes the boundary isn't there to convince them. Sometimes the boundary is there to show you who they are.


And once they show you, believe them.


With love,

Black signature of the author, "Jessi"

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page